August 01, 2012

Mixed reaction in Fiji to sanctions change


Updated 1 August 2012, 9:15 AEST

Reaction in Fiji to the partial relaxation of sanctions on the coup-installed military government has been mixed.


Shamima Ali, a former Fiji Human Rights Commissioner says the interim government needs to improve the human rights situation in the country, while Attar Singh, general secretary of the Fiji Islands Confederation of Trade Unions, says Australia and New Zealand have acted prematurely.
Presenter: Bruce Hill
Speaker: Shamima Ali, coordinator of the Fiji Women's Crisis Centre and a former Fiji Human Rights Commissioner


Public reaction on Qarase guilty verdict hard to gauge says Ganilau

Posted at 19:42 on 31 July, 2012 UTC

Fiji’s ousted prime minister Laisenia Qarase is on bail awaiting sentencing after being found guilty of corruption related charges in a Suva court.

Yesterday, Justice Priyantha Fernando concurred with assessors’ findings on Monday that the 72 year-old is guilty of all nine charges against him.

The Suva High Court was packed and about 200 people spilled waited outside the capital’s Government Buildings in anticipation of the ruling.

The Fiji Independent Commission Against Corruption brought the charges against Mr Qarase.

A former interim Minister of Defence and Immigration, Ratu Epeli Ganilau, says it will be hard to gauge the reactions to the guilty of verdict as the people have no voice in Fiji.
“The government says the judiciary is independent and the views of the people again is pretty hard to engage whether they would agree with that or not because not much public view is entertained through the media and the newspapers in particular but all we see and hear is the view of the government, if you were to ask the individual Fijian on the street, you may have a different opinions and yet we don’t get to see much of that reported in the papers.”
Ratu Epeli Ganilau.


Former Fiji govt Minister says Qarase guilty verdict sad day for country

Posted at 17:55 on 31 July, 2012 UTC

Fiji’s former Minister for youth and sports says the guilty verdict given to ousted Prime Minister Laisenia Qarase is a sad day for democracy in Fiji.

Qarase is on bail awaiting sentencing after being found guilty of corruption related charges in a Suva court.

Yesterday, Justice Priyantha Fernando concurred with assessors’ findings on Monday that the 72 year-old is guilty of all nine charges against him.

The Fiji Independent Commission Against Corruption brought the charges against Qarase, and declined to comment on the guilty verdict.

A former Minister for youth and sports and colleague, Rajesh Singh, says the judiciary is not impartial and it’s a sad day for democracy.
“The court system is very much controlled by the regime and you look at the assessors, the three assessors were the civil servants, so what do you expect from where there is no democracy in the country and no impartial judiciary. I think it’s a sad day for not only for Fiji but it’s a sad day for democracy and a judicial system in Fiji and how it’s run and operated by the regime.”
Mr Singh says while Qarase might be facing a jail sentence he still has hope that he can recover to lead the nation.


Fiji must still feel the pressure


EDITORIALS
From: The Australian August 01, 2012 12:00AM


FOREIGN Minister Bob Carr needs to be careful not to give away too much, too soon, in Fiji. The agreement, with New Zealand, to return our respective high commissioners to Suva and allow Fiji to reappoint a high commissioner in Canberra is not an especially big deal.
But the danger is the country's military strongman, Commodore Frank Bainimarama, will interpret it as reward for progress towards democratic reform when, in fact, there has been little. Any such misconception will do nothing to maintain the pressure needed to ensure an early return to elected civilian rule.
In a statement with his New Zealand and Fiji counterparts, Senator Carr explained the move would open channels of dialogue. That's fair enough. But it needs to be placed in the context of Fiji's tardy progress towards restoring democracy and Mr Bainimarama's penchant for promising much and delivering little. It is important to measure words against deeds and there is no escaping the reality that for all Mr Bainimarama's hype about elections promised for some time after September 2014 (eight years since he staged his second coup), the country is anything but free or democratic. The media is shackled, human rights are under constant threat, a ban on meetings has only just been lifted and trade unionists are imprisoned.
In their statement, Senator Carr and his colleagues spoke of progress towards the election, including preparations for constitutional consultations and electronic voter registration. There are indications the drafting commission, headed by the respected international constitutional expert Yash Ghai, is making some headway. But it's hardly enough to justify any accolades for Mr Bainimarama that may be implied in the high commissioners' return. It might have been prudent to await more tangible signs of progress towards reform before normalising relations. Even better would have been to make normalisation contingent on holding a demonstrably free and fair election, something that might have persuaded Mr Bainimarama to bring forward the distant date of 2014. Now that Senator Carr has made his decision, however, the return of our high commissioner to Suva must be used to leverage even more pressure on Mr Bainimarama for a democratic election to be held sooner rather than later.