September 07, 2011

Lowy Institute pushes again on Fiji issue

It is being revealed that on the cusp of the Pacific leaders meeting in Auckland, the Lowy Institute is once again pushing for a change in position on Fiji’s situation to revert its continued isolation from the Pacific Islands Forum (PIF) family.

Lowy has apparently commissioned Tebbutt Research to conduct a poll in Fiji and various sources are citing that the findings point to an “overwhelming” support of the illegal and treasonous military regime. Caz Tebutt the principal of Tebutt Research based in Fiji is a member of the Fiji-Australia Business Council.

Now if this poll results do indicate this, how fantastic! All that will now be needed is for Fiji to cement those poll results and the fantastic "64/65% support charter" in an election (with UN/PIF observers) where the resounding truth of democratic votes will not be denied.

What defies logic however in this secret-squirrel exercise pushed by Lowy is that virtually no one in Fiji knew that this was happening.

Secondly in a country where repression, censorship and tyranny reigns – if a stranger such as a researcher accosts you for your opinion of the regime, it is a no-brainer that answer will be pro-regime, out of the sheer fear of repercussions.

The purpose of this exercise is still unclear. Lowy’s proponent of this exercise and complete newbie to the Pacific admits that the PIF will not move on Fiji. So too does the PIF Host, NZ Prime Minister John Key, in addition to the most senior of the PIF statesmen todate, Samoan Prime Minister Tuilaepa Malielegaoi.

Ex-PIF employee, Dr Roman Grynberg’s fervent opportunistic jibes at Aust and NZ shooting from the shoulders of a completely unrelated Fiji issue continuously attempts to remain regionally relevant and confuse Fiji's non-PACER plus trade participation while ignoring fundamental principles of the rule of law and human rights – for even if the regime participates in these trade negotiations, taxpayers are being represented against their will by unelected usurpers.

Planned pro-democracy protests in Auckland targeting the PIF leaders might also show up to challenge the Lowy’s findings.

But the fact of the matter is the PIF in its 40th years of history has never changed agreed-to positions just like the UN has never changed agreed to points of view. 

September 02, 2011

Dr Wadan Narsey: Ending our cycles of religious intolerance

For 95% of the time, the activities of Fiji’s religions have been good for Fiji’s development.  For perhaps 5% of the time, their actions have caused great harm.

Currently, the Military Regime continues its persecution of the Methodist Church, blatantly contravening Article 19 of the UN Declaration of Basic Human Rights:  Everyone has the right to freedom .... either alone or in community with others and in public or private, to manifest his religion or belief in teaching, practice, worship and observance.”

Other religions in Fiji who are allowed to freely have their gatherings and functions, remain quiet.

These Catholic, Anglican, Hindu, and Muslim religious organizations are at a cross-road in Fiji’s troubled history.

They can do the difficult but right thing today, by speaking up to express their disapproval of the Regime’s treatment of the Methodist Church.  Or, wallowing in the past injustices, they can remain silent.

If religious leaders remain quiet, then the religious followers and their educated leaders, must rise to the challenge.

If both religious leaders and followers remain silent during these troubled times, Fiji is unlikely to come out of our cycles of religious intolerance.

Easy to have revenge
No doubt, many Hindus, Catholics and Muslims feel a quiet satisfaction that the Methodists are being persecuted by the Military Regime - “maleka”- “now you see what it feels like” to be persecuted!

They of course remember 1987 and 2000 when the Methodist Church supported the military coups that removed democratically elected governments, and demanded the imposition of a “Christian State” and “Sunday Bans”.

Temples and mosques had been burnt creating great psychological anxiety, distress and anger amongst Hindu and Muslim followers, many of whom began to feel that Fiji could never be their home, if they could not freely practise their religion. Many did emigrate.

But in 1987, the Catholic and other Christian clerics and adherents (and don’t forget the few conscientious Methodists like Rev. Koroi and others) earned huge goodwill from Hindus and Muslims by speaking up for their religious freedoms.

This no doubt also encouraged Hindu and Muslim participation in the Council of Churches, which played a powerful bridging role between religions and ethnic groups.

Today’s Catholics and Hindus as guilty as 1987 Methodists
Since 2006, the Catholic and Hindu religious organisations have behaved just as badly as the Methodists did in 1987.

They came out in support of a military coup that treasonously  removed a democratically elected government.

The leaders of the Catholic Church, the Hindu Sanatan Dharam  and Arya Samaj, and the Muslim League took prominent part in the NCBBF whose culmination was the People’s Charter, with its first paragraph swearing allegiance to the 1997 Constitution.

Many Catholics and Hindus took up positions in the Military Regime’s Boards.

They continued to support the Regime, even after the Appeal Court ruled in 2009 that the 2006 coup and the President’s actions were illegal and treasonous.

The military allegations of widespread corruption, both financial and electoral, have never been proven after five years - and are unlikely to be.

Without any public statement against what has happened since 2006 and 2009, these religious leaders remain collaborators in a treasonous military coup, and all its resultant evils: lack of accountability for hundreds of millions of tax-payers funds, destruction of the economy, draconian media censorship, and personal enrichment, to name just a few.

These actions of the Catholic, Hindu and Muslim organisations are no different today from those of the Methodists in 1987.

They have never publicly withdrawn their support of the 2006 Military coup, and they do not speak out in support of their sister Methodist Church who are persecuted.

Of course, neither has the Methodist Church ever made clear public statements admitting that their support of the 1987 and 2000 coups was treasonous and morally wrong.

And so the sad vicious cycle of religious intolerance continues, building up dams of evil for the future.

Religion is personal AND social
The purest and truest religion is between the individual “Person” and “God”.  There is no real need for religious organisations, leaders, buildings, or gatherings.

Yet all religions the world over have organisations, leaders, buildings of worship and gatherings.  These all strengthen the social bonds that the adherents have with each other, and enable them to collectively achieve many other good things in life often neglected by the State.

Despite our destructive military coups, Fiji is still one of the more developed countries in the Pacific because all our many religious organisations, have very successfully built and managed schools, technical and agricultural colleges, now universities, old peoples’ homes, orphanages, and welfare organizations.

Despite their great poverty, they also build ostentatious churches, temples and mosques, even though God has no need for physical buildings.

But one of the social benefits of religion, that even agnostics like me acknowledge, is that religious “peer group” social pressure is often the only thing that stops many ordinary humans from doing evil towards their fellow citizens.

For this valuable social aspect of religion, people must be allowed to freely gather together- to pray, to sing, to raise funds, and to discuss whatever matters they wish to discuss.  It is their basic human right to do so.

No one should be allowed to stop this basic human right, least of all an illegal Military Regime which has callously turned its tax-payer funded guns, on its own people.

Today, Hindus, Catholics, Anglicans, Muslims and even Indo-Fijian Methodists, are allowed by this Military Regime to freely practise their religion. 

But not the indigenous Fijian Methodists. 

Learning from the past
No religious organisation today can sit on their high horses and say “We are innocent”.

Many anonymous Methodist bloggers look back with great regret, to their own support of the coups in 19897 and 2000, and turned a blind eye to all the resulting injustices to others.

Today, many genuine Catholics must be wondering whether their support of the 2006 military coup has done far more damage to Fiji and the interests of poor, than the good done by small sums thrown around for social welfare and squatter housing.

Clerics who supported the Military’s alleged electoral reform after the 2006 coup, must be wondering, whether they were merely used to justify a coup, and perhaps will soon be recalled out of their little boxes, for the next Act in the Military Charade.

Many ordinary Hindus, following the Military requirement for permits to have religious gatherings like Ram Naumi, now must have great doubts about the honesty, integrity and accountability of the Military Regime, which has also destroyed the sugar industry, and persecuted their political and trade union leaders.

Ending the cycle of religious intolerance
Religious leaders have a glorious opportunity to rise above past discordance and defend the religious freedoms of all religions, Methodists and others, while all acknowledging their mistakes in the past.

Religious leaders, who know the importance of repentance, are surely ideal people to take the lead in reconciliation in Fiji today, especially as most should not have personal material agendas (although some clearly do).

It is in such difficult times that religious leaders can prove their leadership mantles, just as some did in 1987 and 2000.

Here also is a valuable opportunity for the many intellectuals of all races, who support these religious bodies, to offer their wise advice and guide the religious leaders.

If the religious and intellectual leaders fail to lead, then they place enormous burdens on ordinary Christians, Hindus and Muslims to “do the right thing”.

Usually ordinary people can’t -- witness all the global nightmares of religious intolerance and violence-- between Christians and Muslims, Hindus and Muslims, Hindus and Christians.

Good people of Fiji: you have an opportunity to end the cycles of religious bigotry that began in 1987.

Let not the evils of media censorship and Public Emergency Decrees, or the pernicious desire for “revenge”, stop you in this worthy endeavor.

Blessed will be they who extend their helping hands to those who are down. And doubly blessed will be Fiji.


The Pacific Circus

It was as clear as day prior to the "Pacific Circus" that our Pacific neighbours would be ambushed into accepting the illegal and treasonous military regime's roadmap that attempts in vain to legimitize itself, even though public rejection of them is becoming bolder by the day.

Tragically these leaders are confusing the Fiji situation as being an occassion in which to defiantly shoot from Fiji's shoulders about regional self-determination, while opportunistically furthering their own interests. 

Duplicitously, the talk-fest is being paid for by taxpayers in Fiji against their will even as they are deprived of civil liberties, while our neighbours farcically seek to liberate Tahiti Nui.

Despite the regime's pitiful attempt to foil the PIF process, it is once again as clear as day, that these fabulous words and aspirations will be filed neatly away somewhere and duly forgotten.
Fiji's shadow looms over forum
Updated September 2, 2011 11:24:38

Next week the leaders of thirteen Pacific Island countries and the Prime Ministers of Australia and New Zealand will be gathering in Auckland next week for the annual Pacific Islands Forum Leaders Meeting.

They will be celebrating the 40th anniversary of the Forum's creation - but one of the founding members, Fiji, will be missing. Fiji, now under military led rule, is suspended from the Forum.

Presenter: Sean Dorney
Speakers: Richard Marles, Australia's Parliamentary Secretary for Pacific Island Affairs; Murray McCully, New Zealand's Foreign Minister; Danny Philip, Solomon Islands Prime Minister; Frank Yourn, Executive Director Australia-Pacific Islands Business Council; Derek Brian, Pacific Institue of Public Policy; Anote Tong, Kiribati President

DORNEY: Fiji's military commander and Prime Minister, Commodore Frank Bainimarama, is banned from the Auckland Pacific Islands Forum Leaders meeting. But nevertheless he is staking his claim to being the Pacific region's natural leader. Just a matter of days before the annual Pacific Forum meeting - he is hosting two regional summits. As current Chairman of the Melanesian Spearhead Group of countries he's called them to Fiji and he is also chairing his second "Engaging with Fiji" meeting. At least three leaders who'll be attending the Forum meeting in Auckland are by his side. But both New Zealand and Australia would like to believe none of this matters. Australia's Parliamentary Secretary for Pacific Island Affairs, Richard Marles:

MARLES: I don't think there is any country in the Pacific that feels comfortable with the position that Fiji is taking at the moment. Now, every country, of course, is going to engage with Fiji in its own way but I think however countries are dealing with the Pacific, with Fiji, I'm sorry, the central message has been clear across the Pacific is that what countries want to see is see Fiji start to take meaningful steps to a return to democracy and that's what Australia wants to see as well.

DORNEY: New Zealand's Foreign Minister, Murray McCully, says Fiji won't dominate next week's Forum.

McCULLY: Fiji will be the subject of some discussion but not too much because my sense around the region is that we've had to spend rather too much time at important Forum meetings talking about Fiji and not enough time on some of the positive issues that could take the region forward and so we don't want to get bogged down where there's an area of difference there.

DORNEY: Mr McCully was speaking during a recent visit to Solomon Islands where the Prime Minister, Danny Philip, said they had not even discussed Fiji and that the Solomons had its own policy on the issue.

PHILIP: We're going to remain with our all embracing policy towards Fiji.

DORNEY: Fiji's suspension from the Forum has created huge problems for the proposed regional trade and development deal between, on the one side, the island countries and, on the other, Australia and New Zealand. It's known as PACER Plus and the negotiations are difficult. Fiji does not participate. That's ridiculous according to the Australia-Pacific Islands Business Council. The Council's Executive Director, Frank Yourn:

YOURN: The regional economic agreement in the Pacific can't be negotiated without Fiji being completely at the table. And until that happens there really isn't going to be any progress.

DORNEY: Australia's Parliamentary Secretary for Pacific Islands Affairs, Mr Marles, puts the blame on Fiji.

MARLES: There is, of course, an awkwardness associated with dealing with Fiji when you are talking about economic matters because we all understand that Fiji is a very important country in the Pacific and it is central to the economy of the Pacific. But this only highlights the difficulty associated with the current regime in Fiji. What is making this awkwardness, what is making this difficult is the fact that we have a regime in Fiji today which is not democratic. And what would solve all of these problems quickest is if we actually saw a meaningful return to democracy in Fiji. And that's really the path that we need to go down. And it's very important that whatever mechanisms we establish in relation to engaging in PACER Plus that bigger picture is kept up front and centre in what we do.

DORNEY: The man tasked with helping the Pacific Islands negotiate with Australia and New Zealand is Dr Chris Noonan. At the Auckland Forum meeting the island countries will be asking Australia's Prime Minister, Julia Gillard, who will be making her first foray into the Pacific, why promised Australian funding for Dr Noonan's office has become such an obstacle. New Zealand is providing annual funding but Australia is insisting on quarterly reviews which is seen in the Pacific as compromising Dr Noonan's independence. Mr Marles defends AusAID's demands.

MARLES: All we want to do is make sure that the activities that we are funding, that there is accountability for those activities and that there is a proper reporting that those activities are being completed.

DORNEY: But the Australia-Pacific Islands Business Council's, Frank Yourn, says he sympathises with Dr Noonan's predicament.

YOURN: It does seem to me that some sort of three month financial reporting cycle makes it difficult to plan a forward business program if you've only got secured funding for three months.

DORNEY: Another issue that the Island countries will want to discuss is why the success of the Pacific seasonal labour scheme in New Zealand has not been replicated yet in Australia despite a pilot scheme being announced three years ago. Derek Brian, from the Port Vila based Pacific Institue of Public Policy says the Australian scheme leaves a lot to be desired.

BRIAN: It's definitely something that Australia needs to pick its game up on. It's something that most Pacific Island countries and the Melanesian countries in particular have been lobbying very hard for and I imagine we're going to hear the same again in Auckland.

DORNEY: Climate change is a subject worrying most island countries in the Pacific. The low lying coral atoll nations like Kiribati fear their entire future is threatened. President Anote Tong will be pushing for a strong statement from the Forum.

TONG: I appeal to the international community not to continue to negotiate but actually do something about it concrete.

DORNEY: What President Tong and the other island states want is far simpler processes to enable them to access some of the billions of dollars promised as global climate change adaptation funds. The head of the United Nations is heading to Auckland via Kiribati and this year's Forum is certain to adopt a resolution supporting their pleas. The reason this year's Forum is being held in New Zealand is so that the leaders will be able to attend the opening game of the Rugby World Cup between the All Blacks and Tonga. Fiji will be playing in the tournament - although its military leaders are definitely not invited. 


This has been Sean Dorney for Pacific Beat.

Injustice Anthony Gates about to flee the cuckoo's nest?

Rumours are circulating within the hallowed halls of justice that Injustice Anthony Gates will be resigning this month and that he hopes to enjoy his retirement, freedom and liberty in Sri Lanka.

Now that a second FICAC prosecutor has spilled more beans the writing must be on the wall that the jig is up.

Also notably absent from all forms of publicity stunts these days (even before Eid started) is the illegal and treasonous Aiyaz Sayed Khaiyum.