PM: Vodafone Fiji pulls out

Source: The National, Tuesday August 6th, 2013
By MALUM NALU

VODAFONE Fiji has pulled the plug on an agreement signed with bemobile in April to take over the management of the mobile phone company, according to Prime Minister Peter O’Neill.

A disappointed O’Neill said the Fiji National Provident Fund had pulled out of the deal, and he would be writing to his Fijian counterpart, Frank Bainimarama, to express PNG’s disappointment.

It comes as a thorn in the side at a time when Bainimarama and O’Neill are working towards closer economic relations between the two countries.

All is not lost however as O’Neill said the Government would be looking at the Independent Public Business Corporation (IPBC) and Telikom to fill in the void.

It comes as an anti-climax after all the hype and fanfare after  State Enterprise Minister Ben Micah signed the agreement worth K88 million with Vodafone Fiji representatives in April.

It was the culmination of months of work, and would have seen bemobile with the capital and strategic partnerships to enable it to compete and thrive in PNG and the Solomon Islands and bring much-needed competition to this sector in PNG, particularly against major player, Digicel.

The loan agreement would have seen Vodafone Fiji manage bemobile’s telecommunication system.

Under the agreement, the IPBC would have share equity of 51%, while FNPF would own 40%.

The other 9% would have been shared between the PNG Sustainable Development Programme (PNGSDP), Steamships and Nasfund under the deal.

Micah, who was at the forefront of the deal, said PNG would have to look at life beyond Vodafone Fiji.

“Several days ago, the Fiji National Provident Fund decided not to extend the grace period, meaning that they have pulled out,” he said.

“This effectively means that the State will have to look at the investment strategy for bemobile going forward, through other options.

“They (FNPF) advised the chairman of bemobile and IPBC some days ago. I was advised and we have since decided not to create any more uncertainty in the business.

“This is why the IPBC board decided to accept withdrawal of the Fiji National Provident Fund.

“Our prime minister will be writing to the prime minister of Fiji to formally advise him that they are not coming in.

“The (PNG) government will have to find 40% funding to fund the way forward for bemobile, but like the prime minister mentioned, IPBC and Telikom will take over and see if they can raise the funds.

“Telecommunications is a big business, so they should be okay.”

Samoan PM says PIDF will never replace Forum

Updated 6 August 2013, 16:36 AEST

Samoa's prime minister has dismissed the idea that the Pacific islands Development Forum, currently underway in Fiji, will ever replace the Pacific Islands Forum.

Tuilaepa Sailele says Samoa is not attending the PIDF because it is duplicating activities already covered by the Forum and other organisations.

The prime minister tells Bruce Hill that he disagrees with comments by Fiji interim prime minister Commodore Frank Bainimarama that the Pacific Islands Forum is dominated only by a few and in too many instances, it no longer genuinely represents the Pacific's interests and needs.

Presenter: Bruce Hill

Speaker: Samoa's prime minister, Tuilaepa Sailele

Listen here.

Tourist free

August 7, 2013 | Filed under: Fiji News | Posted by: newsroom
By SHEIK DEAN

A 43-year-old Chinese businessman has been acquitted by the Nadi Magistrates Court after initially being charged with failing to declare foreign currency.

The charge
Jinrong Nie was charged with one count of failing to declare foreign currency on his Immigration Card upon arrival at the Nadi International Airport on August 2.

The plea
Nie appeared before Magistrate Mohammed Ajmeer on Monday and pleaded guilty to the charge.

The case
It was revealed in court that an immigration officer had searched Nei’s luggage at Nadi International Airport and found the foreign currency equivalent to F$52,987.04.

The money was seized and the matter was reported to Police.

In his mitigation Nie told the court he was unaware that it was an offence not to declare foreign currency under the laws of Fiji.

Nie, of Macau, in China, also told court that he came for a holiday with his family to Fiji. Magistrate Mohammed Ajmeer fined Nie F$2000 for not declaring foreign currency and ordered Police to return his money.

Magistrate Ajmeer also asked Nie to declare foreign currency when he departs Fiji.

Nie is currently in Fiji with his family for holiday.

Dr Marc Edge: Grubby's hypocrisy laid bare

Wednesday, July 31, 2013

You could practically see the smoke coming out of Grubby’s ears as he spluttered out a protest on his blog today over Radio Australia having “suppressed” – according to him – news favorable to Fiji’s dictatorship. 

He accused RA journalist Bruce Hill of bias and RadioAustralia not only of engaging in propaganda, but of committing a “blatant attempt to manipulate the news agenda.” Apparently the rank hypocrisy inherent in him making such claims simply doesn’t register with Grubby, who admitted last year to being on the payroll of Washington-based Qorvis Communications in its efforts to help polish the image of Fiji’s dictatorship. It needs a lot of polishing, too, after the events of the past eight months, which have seen the junta spike a draft constitution drawn up by a panel of experts and a video circulate on the Internet showing the brutal beating of two escaped prisoners. The latest public relations disaster to befall the regime has seen political parties forced to pay tens of thousands of dollars to the regime mouthpiece Fiji Sun to advertise the assets and income of their candidates while junta honchos continue to refuse to do the same. 

No wonder the regime has seized on any nugget of hope it can find. Grubby’s latest rant on behalf of the regime concerns a speech given earlier this week by Julie Bishop, the Deputy Leader of the Australian Opposition and Shadow Minister for Foreign Affairs and Trade. Speaking to the Australia Fiji Business Forum, Bishop promised to work toward restoring Fiji to its previous place in the world if her party is elected in the upcoming vote. “It is now time to rebuild the bridges,” she said. “Should a Coalition Government be elected at some stage this year I commit to ensuring that normalising relations between Australia and Fiji is a priority of an incoming government.” According to Grubby, this position is now “official” Australian government policy. He uses the word twice in one paragraph to reinforce the fact. Worse, Radio Australia failed to pick up on the significance of this sea change in official Australian policy toward Fiji.

Here was the first significant change in official Australian attitudes towards Fiji in the six and a half years since Voreqe Bainimarama’s takeover. .  . By conventional news standards the world over, it signaled a dramatic change in Australian official attitude and deserved to receive the widest coverage. But Radio Australia chose to ignore it.

Australian taxpayers, spluttered Grubby, are “entitled to know is by whose authority Hill, and the rest of the Radio Australia editorial team, chose to overlook a major shift in Australian attitude.” The incident, he continued, “raises grave questions about the editorial independence of Radio Australia,” and is “especially egregious in that it involves the overt censorship of an important speech.” Grubby admits that he “has long alleged a campaign of wilful and sustained bias against Fiji by Radio Australia,” but he insists that “previous instances pale into insignificance beside evidence that Radio Australia is willing to subvert the political process inAustralia and deny a voice to the alternative government."

It is more than a grave editorial lapse. It is also contrary to law. On the available evidence, it’s a case of the publicly funded broadcaster taking a partisan position in a manner that contravenes every aspect of the ABC’s Charter. This legally requires it – under an act of Parliament – to report without fear or favour in the interests of every Australian.

So let’s take a look at just how newsworthy this story might be according to accepted principles of news. There is some theory involved here, but suffice it to point out that the word “new” is the root of the word “news.”  This suggests that something old is not necessarily news, and Bishop’s position on working toward normalizing relations with Fiji is hardly new. A cursory web search shows that she articulated it in 2010 and again last year. Plus, as Grubby himself notes, Radio Australia’s Pacific Beat programme already had two items of “new” news on Fiji that day. I'm sure Grubby would admit that Pacific Beat has whole ocean of other countries to cover, and less newsworthy stories occasionally fall by the wayside. Plus, this was a speech by an Opposition politician, and Grubby has made his view perfectly clear that this species deserve very wary news coverage indeed, lest they actually be *shudder* playing politics.

There were other newsworthy bits in Bishop’s speech which Grubby and his regime masters . . . er, mistress might be less enthusiastic about. Like the part about just what the Fiji junta will have to deliver in order to bring free and fair elections next year and thus be welcomed back into the international community. She pointed out three in particular that are not likely to go over well with the regime.

1. It is essential that oppositions and politicians have the freedom to hold the government to account.
2. It is essential that an independent judiciary exists to adjudicate disputes and to interpret the law.
3. A free and unfettered media might be a complete pain in the neck for politicians but it is essential to hold all the sides of politics to account on behalf of the people.

So don’t go getting your hopes up, Grubby. There is little likelihood of any of those three conditions being met any time soon. Even if the Coalition wins the election, Frank and Aiyaz have little chance of getting back into Australia’s “official” good graces anytime soon, the way they are going.